Current:Home > MarketsMassachusetts lawmakers target "affirmative action for the wealthy" -GlobalInvest
Massachusetts lawmakers target "affirmative action for the wealthy"
View
Date:2025-04-11 14:01:59
So-called legacy college admissions — or giving preference to the children of alumni — is coming under new scrutiny following the Supreme Court's ruling last week that scraps the use of affirmative action to pick incoming students.
Lawmakers in Massachusetts are proposing a new fee that would be levied on the state's colleges and universities that use legacy preferences when admitting students, including Harvard University and Williams College, a highly ranked small liberal arts college. Any money raised by the fee would then be used to fund community colleges within the state.
The proposed law comes as a civil rights group earlier this month sued Harvard over legacy admissions at the Ivy League school, alleging the practice discriminates against students of color by giving an unfair advantage to the mostly White children of alumni. Harvard and Williams declined to comment on the proposed legislation.
Highly ranked schools such as Harvard have long relied on admissions strategies that, while legal, are increasingly sparking criticism for giving a leg up to mostly White, wealthy students. Legacy students, the children of faculty and staff, recruited athletes and kids of wealthy donors represented 43% of the White students admitted to Harvard, a 2019 study found.
"Legacy preference, donor preference and binding decision amount to affirmative action for the wealthy," Massachusetts Rep. Simon Cataldo, one of the bill's co-sponsors, told CBS MoneyWatch.
The Massachusetts lawmakers would also fine colleges that rely on another strategy often criticized as providing an unfair advantage to students from affluent backgrounds: early-decision applications, or when students apply to a school before the general admissions round.
Early decision usually has a higher acceptance rate than the general admissions pool, but it typically draws wealthier applicants
because early applicants may not know how much financial aid they could receive before having to decide on whether to attend.
Because Ivy League colleges now routinely cost almost $90,000 a year, it's generally the children of the very rich who can afford to apply for early decision.
"At highly selective schools, the effect of these policies is to elevate the admissions chances of wealthy students above higher-achieving students who don't qualify as a legacy or donor prospect, or who need to compare financial aid packages before committing to a school," Cataldo said.
$100 million from Harvard
The proposed fee as part of the bill would be levied on the endowments of colleges and universities that rely on such strategies. Cataldo estimated that the law would generate over $120 million in Massachusetts each year, with $100 million of that stemming from Harvard.
That's because Harvard has a massive endowment of $50.9 billion, making it one of the nation's wealthiest institutions of higher education. In 2020, the university had the largest endowment in the U.S., followed by Yale and the University of Texas college system, according to the National Center for Education Statistics.
Not all colleges allow legacy admissions. Some institutions have foresworn the practice, including another Massachusetts institution, MIT. The tech-focused school also doesn't use binding early decision.
"Just to be clear: we don't do legacy," MIT said in an admissions blog post that it points to as explaining its philosophy. "[W]e simply don't care if your parents (or aunt, or grandfather, or third cousin) went to MIT."
It added, "So to be clear: if you got into MIT, it's because you got into MIT. Simple as that."
"Good actors" in higher education, like MIT, wouldn't be impacted by the proposed fee, Cataldo noted.
- In:
- College
veryGood! (74)
Related
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- Alaska governor vetoes bill requiring insurance cover a year of birth control at a time
- John Stamos Reveals Why He Was Kicked Out of a Scientology Church
- Tribal leaders push Republican Tim Sheehy to apologize for comments on Native Americans
- Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
- Underwater tunnel to Manhattan leaks after contractor accidentally drills through it
- Debate Flares Over Texas’ Proposed Oil and Gas Waste Rule
- Love Is Blind's Shaina Hurley Shares She Was Diagnosed With Cancer While Pregnant
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- Opening statements are scheduled in the trial of a man who killed 10 at a Colorado supermarket
Ranking
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- Will Taylor Swift attend the Chiefs game Thursday against the Ravens? What we know
- What to Know About Rebecca Cheptegei, the Olympic Runner Set on Fire in a Gasoline Attack
- Travis Kelce's Reps Respond to Alleged Taylor Swift Breakup Plan
- Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
- A prosecutor asks for charges to be reinstated against Alec Baldwin in the ‘Rust’ case
- Judge blocks Ohio from enforcing laws restricting medication abortions
- 'Our family is together again': Dogs rescued from leveled home week after Alaska landslide
Recommendation
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
California companies wrote their own gig worker law. Now no one is enforcing it
US Interior Secretary announces restoration of the once-endangered Apache trout species in Arizona
19 hurt after jail transport van collides with second vehicle, strikes pole northwest of Chicago
Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
Save Up to 74% on Pants at Old Navy: $8 Shorts, $9 Leggings & More Bestsellers on Sale for a Limited Time
Raygun, viral Olympic breaker, defends herself amid 'conspiracy theories'
Will Taylor Swift attend the Chiefs game Thursday against the Ravens? What we know